Chants of "We vape, we vote" echoed through the Utah Capitol as vape advocates protested a bill to prohibit flavored vape sales.
Senate Bill 61 would ban all flavored electronic cigarette products in Utah that lack FDA approval. This mainly targets sweet flavors that appeal to youth.
Vape shop owners argue the bill hurts small businesses to benefit big tobacco. But health advocates say flavored vapes hook children on nicotine.
"I can't quantify the kids disturbed during hospital stays going through (nicotine) withdrawals," said the bill's sponsor, Sen. Jen Plumb. She's seeking to prevent a "lifetime of dependence."
69% of Utah students like sweet vape flavors
Plumb cited survey data showing 69% of students enjoy sweet flavors, versus just 2% liking tobacco flavors.
"I don't know anyone with nicotine dependence who wouldn't take back picking up the habit younger," said Plumb, a physician focused on overdose prevention.
Vape advocates protest "anti-business" bill
The Utah Vapor Business Association organized Capitol protests against SB61 prior to committee hearings.
"Adults want flavors," advocates chanted, claiming the bill caters to big tobacco over small vape shops.
They faulted sponsors for ignoring proposals to enhance security instead of a sales ban that could "legislate away bad habits."
Beau Maxun of the vapor association said specialty shops help consumers quit smoking. Shutting them down via a flavor ban enables big tobacco's monopoly, he argued.
Supporters say bill "levels playing field"
Supporters like the Utah Retail Merchants Association president Dave Davis contend SB61 simply makes regulations consistent.
It allows all retailers to cross-check an FDA registry before selling products. "Everyone will sell the same products," he said.
If shops rely on flavors like "Captain Crunch" and "bubble gum," they need a new model, Davis suggested.
In the end, the House Health Committee voted 9-1 to advance SB61 for consideration by the full House.
